The Final Project for this class will be a culmination of your learning over the five weeks of the course and an integration of the information you have learned about the risk factors, symptoms, diagn

June 5, 2021

Read instructions and rubric carefully:

Option #2: Individual Healthcare Rights

In a PowerPoint presentation, discuss the importance of patient rights and the responsibility of the provider and the organization to protect these rights. Envision that the presentation will be used as a training mechanism for employees. Research and examine the different rights that patients have and how the staff can work to safeguard these rights. Include a discussion of the new patients’ bill of rights and explain each of the following areas:

  • Patients’ right to access affordable health insurance,
  • Patients’ right to emergency care,
  • Employees’ right to sue employers, and
  • Patients’ right to accountability by health insurers.

Your PowerPoint presentation should meet the following requirements:

  • Be organized using professional themes and transitions.
  • Consist of 8-9 slides including the title and reference slides.
  • Include speaker notes (minimum 75 words) on all slides.
  • Follow the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Review the grading rubric, which can be accessed from the Module 2 folder.

Reach out to your instructor if you have any questions about the assignment.

Rubric

HCM345 Mod 2 CT

HCM345 Mod 2 CT

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis

25.0 to >20.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

20.0 to >15.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

15.0 to >10.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

10.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking

25.0 to >20.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate critical thinking.

20.0 to >15.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical thinking.

15.0 to >10.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in critical thinking.

10.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate critical thinking.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in Healthcare Ethics

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

3.0 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

2.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

3.0 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

2.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 120.0

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.


Buy Custom Nursing Papers

“Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!”

Essay Writing Service